Some people believe that children should be given lessons on how to manage money in the school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Financial management is gaining popularity, these days, among many people. While some of them believe that it is schools’ responsibility, others think differently. In my opinion, I completely agree with this viewpoint that schools provide a conducive environment to learn this imperative subject. This essay will discuss several reasons to support it.
To begin with, early stage education to learn any subject is often advantageous. Awareness creation among student at this stage could generally provide ample time to practice that it. For example, if pupils learn how to manage their finances, they may have sufficient time for accumulation of funds, which can be helpful later in their lives. School education is also usually more effective. This is because children take it more seriously. According to recent study, conducted by Dehli University, students achieve better grades when they study at educational institute; however, when the same pupils were given home tuition, their grades declined significantly. This shows that school education is much more effective than any other place.
Another indispensable reason is the provision of human resource and other material at schools. In other words, they provide educational experts who are experienced and have already been exercising the application of the subject in their lives. Furthermore, books, magazines, assignments and case studies are frequently available there, which are necessary for understanding of any subject.
In summary, money management ought to be learned at an early schooling stage as it provides a great deal for time to exercise it and is more effective. In addition, teachers and other resources availability make it a better place to learn. For all these reason, I prefer schools for education of managing money. It is recommended that every child should know how to spend money and learn saving it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...ective. In addition, teachers and other resources availability make it a better place to ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 389, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to save'.
Suggestion: to save
...hould know how to spend money and learn saving it.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, may, so, while, for example, in addition, in summary, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49146757679 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91302876471 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62457337884 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9405643154 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3888888889 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2777777778 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144447771339 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458759710989 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046912127165 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889469179079 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608183693167 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.