Some people believe that a good way to reduce crime is longer sentences. Others may think there are alternative ways to this problem. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In the contemporary society, whether longer jail sentences is a good way to reduce crime or other alternative ways to reduce this muddle has sparked much of a debate. Some people assert that longer sentences in jail is the best way to reduce crime rate, whereas innumerable think other alternative solutions to this problem. Personally, I am in favor of the latter view.
Crime rate has enormously increased in both urban as well as rural areas. To begin with, people who are involved in crime are openly doing such activities. However, they get arrested by the police and are released either by bail or completing the jail term. Moreover, they tend to get involved in the same business without any fear from the police. For example. a person involved in robbing money and gets caught is aware of the fact, that he will be released from the prison with warning in seven days. However, if the jail term for such criminals is increased, there are ways and means to bribe the police and get out of the situation. Lastly, many policemen are also involved in encouraging crime so that they can get their profit share from the criminals. Therefore, longer jail sentences may help but it is not the good way to reduce crime rates.
On the other hand, other alternate solutions can be given to reduce the crime rate. Firstly, criminals should be punished immediately for doing such activities instead of putting them behind the bars. This will help reduce the infra cost of the jail for the government. Moreover, the punishment should be very strict for all the crimes. Take Saudi Arabia as an example. If any person involved in robbery or any other criminal activity, he is given punishment in front of everyone by chopping off his hands or head. This creates fear among people and helps to reduce crime rates. Similarly, officials should create public awareness about such punishments for avoiding or reducing such criminal activities.
In conclusion, I would concede that longer jail sentences may have some supremacy. Despite that, other alternatives supports in a much better way. Overall, I am convinced that crime can be reduced by other alternate solutions rather than increasing the jail term for criminals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... has enormously increased in both urban as well as rural areas. To begin with, people who ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
... any fear from the police. For example. a person involved in robbing money and ge...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, similarly, so, therefore, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93048128342 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55848124935 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513368983957 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6362954478 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8181818182 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302139341236 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919847449551 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10999465477 0.0667982634062 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224341909156 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133570274358 0.056905535591 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.