Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an
unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try
and improve such situations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own
knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
<span class="fontstyle0">Some people consider that the loss of individual species of plants and animals is the<br>main environmental problem of our time. Attempts to preserve rare or dying species<br>are carried out in zoos or other specialist plant and animal facilities, through breeding<br>programmes, preservation orders and other forms of protection and there was genuine<br>sadness among many when the last surviving white rhino died earlier this year.<br>Survival of the fittest is nature's way of ruthlessly allowing weaker specimens to die<br>out, although mankind has also contributed to falling animal numbers through hunting<br>and poaching. However, whether saving individual species should be the main focus<br>of environmental protection is debatable. Climate change and excessive use of plastic<br>are just two other major problems that deserve our attention.<br>The evidence of climate change is there for us all to see: rising sea levels and<br>associated flooding with the loss of homes at low land levels are becoming more<br>frequent. Many countries and island communities are now calling for urgent action to<br>delay, halt or even reverse the process, although if we believe the experts, reversal is<br>impossible. Habitable areas are gradually shrinking, often for some of the poorest<br>groups of people, but there seems to be little obvious action taking place. If the major<br>contributors to climate change will not support the reduction of greenhouse gases,<br>there is little hope for the future.<br>Naturalists have also begun to expose the serious problems arising from discarded<br>plastic waste. Birds and animals can die gruesome deaths through being trapped<br>or caught up in plastic bags or ropes, while the long process required for these<br>plastics to decay means that they remain a threat for many years to come. Worse,<br>there is now beginning to be evidence of sea creatures ingesting smaller globules of<br>disintegrating plastic, which harms them and all the other creatures in their particular<br>food chain.<br>The loss of particular species, both flora and fauna, is cause for regret, but I do not<br>agree that they are the most important environmental problems these days. If climate<br>change and damage from plastic continue, there will be less land and less food for<br>everyone, including plants and animals.</span>
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 721, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...saving individual species should be the main focus
of environmental protection is debat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1495, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , ...upport the reduction of greenhouse gases,
there is little hope for the future.<...> ^^
Line 2, column 1870, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , ...n a threat for many years to come. Worse,
there is now beginning to be evidence...
^^
Line 2, column 2381, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ne, including plants and animals.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2047.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 6.05621301775 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.27609784496 2.80592935109 152% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647928994083 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 113.398809518 49.4020404114 230% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 204.7 106.682146367 192% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8 20.7667163134 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0477371309037 0.244688304435 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0273514006275 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0144145461105 0.0667982634062 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0477371309037 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.0 13.0946893788 183% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.3001002004 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.46 12.4159519038 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 9.78957915832 209% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 24.0 10.7795591182 223% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.