Some people believe that it is possible for a country to be economically successful and have a clean environment. Others argue that these two aims are not compatible. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Currently there is a contentious argument over the fact that whether it is possible for a nation to be economically successful and have a clean environment or these two goals cannot coexist together. Economic growth is often accompanied with industrial revolution and results in technological advancements which mostly result in air pollution. In this essay I will discuss both views and then conclude by giving my opinion.
Beyond any qualms there are a myriad of logical rationales that prove that the two goals of economic growth and a clean environment can exist parallel. Economic growth is generally a result of increase in the literacy rate and when such trained and intellectual individuals invade the business world they directly lead to economic development of the nation. Educated people are more sensible and can be easily educated regarding the need for a clean environment. For example, developed countries with a high literacy rate such as Switzerland and Norway have negligible air pollution issues. This fact is a clear indication that proves that both the goals can coexist together.
On the contrary, some people believe that education is not a certainty for people to ensure a clean environment. Statistical data comparing literacy rate with the rise of air pollution shows skewed results. For example, countries like India with almost two third of the population literacy rate have high air pollution concerns. Moreover, with the decent economic growth in developed states such as Delhi and Mumbai the issue of air pollution has increased over years. As these places have more immigrants in search of jobs and issues of overpopulation and overcrowding has led to expansion of cities, deforestation and resulting air pollution.
In conclusion, I believe that government should impose rules that mandate the people to seek a solution for causing less air pollution. Although the two goals can certainly coexist; but the only problem is to change the mindset of people who are responsible for causing environment issues. Without making compulsion for following the rules the two goals cannot be achieved together. Will the government of such countries take stringent action? Still remains a question.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 31, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...opinion. Beyond any qualms there are a myriad of logical rationales that prove that t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, regarding, so, still, then, third, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31818181818 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90829179365 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517045454545 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3319716571 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307278096739 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914499332135 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749653878503 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194870380343 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646063316899 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.