Some people believe that the museums and historic sites should be open for free for children under 18. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Most of the young people love to learn historical and cultural things by watching it. Museum and historical sites are one of the way to educate people about art, culture, science, history etc. Childern often find these thing interesting and sometime they might intent to visit these places on their own. However, fares on these sites/places often causes problems to the young people to decide whether to learn things from book or to see it practically. I am agreeing with the content for the underlying reasons.
In modern world, children are happy with their gadgets. They love to browse internet and to some extent they are acquiring knowledge from it. The young people do not have a trend to go to outside to learn things. It is the responsibility of the parents to educate them in a way where they could understand things practically. Museums now a days offer a variety of knowledge regarding art, culture and history. Scientific Museum offers a wide range of research based exhibits. On the other hand, historical sites have background related to the past which will enhance the text based learning. These knowledge driven education is effective and children can be interested to visit places if the place is open for free. For example, if a boy has a plan to hangout to some place with his friends and planned to visit a place with historical background, then he will definitely learn something new and also the recreational purpose will be served.
Now, museums and historical places authorities do not run business for free. They usually charge half or free for the children below 5 years. The age range of 5 years is a totally questionable age. This is because to understand the value or norms of the place this age’s children is just too immature. The authorities should take initiative to make this age up-to 18 years and add values to the society.
Finally, the museums and historical places, being educational and recreational places, should be open free for all children and teenagers and should be innovative to attract more people to learn new facts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this thing' or 'these things'?
Suggestion: this thing; these things
...ience, history etc. Childern often find these thing interesting and sometime they might int...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 418, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
...eople to decide whether to learn things from book or to see it practically. I am agr...
^^^^
Line 1, column 456, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...s from book or to see it practically. I am agreeing with the content for the underlying rea...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 335, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
... understand things practically. Museums now a days offer a variety of knowledge regarding ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 339, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...erstand things practically. Museums now a days offer a variety of knowledge regarding ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 593, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this knowledge' or 'These knowledges'?
Suggestion: This knowledge; These knowledges
...h will enhance the text based learning. These knowledge driven education is effective and child...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...attract more people to learn new facts.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, regarding, so, then, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90056818182 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67019915365 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528409090909 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9905267806 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.25 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34007456642 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09346970994 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852973628271 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2143695528 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616382274103 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.