The prompt asserts that some people opine that at present humans have too many options. In this modern era, the advancement of technology made an eclectic distinct fields connected with each other. I strongly agree with the contention for two reasons, however, in some instances the opposite is true, there are many disonant choices which integrated into one.
Firstly, we delve into the realm of education." The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance"- Socrates. There should be significant importance given into this field of education. In the pre-historic times, there were no separate fields in education or knowledge. Everyhing fell into one giant field called knowledge ranging from star gazing-astronomy to Pythagoras's right triangle theorem. But, as time passed by, it started to separate into subjects such as philosophy, science, and humanities. After that, it started to differentiate even further, science parted into physics, chemsitry, biology, astronomy, and mathematics. At present, the school of thoughts diverged from its core to more disciplines. For example, if we look into physics, there are theoretical physics and experimental physics. Thus, nowadays we have more choices regarding education, whereas, in the past, we had only a few to choose from.
Secondly, every aspect of our lives have more options nowadays. For example, if we go on to shopping to buy appearels, there are tonnes of choices. There are hundreds of brands of clothing which offers different types and kinds of clothes. And, even there are distinction regarding the fabric of clothes. Moreover, the internet is widening this choice to an inmaginable number of choices, as more and more online shops are lurking over the internet. Another example, in the past, it was quite simple or elementary to people find dates or partners. But, now the advent of social medias and dating apps such as Tinder, Bumbles, and many more , enabaling people to choose another human being from a huge pool of people. Therefore, every aspect of our lives are changing rapidly with wide spectrum of choices.
In conclusion, I agree with the prompt that number choices is becoming too humangous.
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffeee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together Do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 78
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 58
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors who satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods Summari 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'field'?
Suggestion: field
...of technology made an eclectic distinct fields connected with each other. I strongly a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 938, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...past, we had only a few to choose from. Secondly, every aspect of our lives have...
^^^
Line 4, column 640, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s such as Tinder, Bumbles, and many more , enabaling people to choose another huma...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1850.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86215766406 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597142857143 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0285651794 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.0952380952 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 3.4128256513 410% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186565454736 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491889215326 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606607322683 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128342658964 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536526946528 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.