Some people believe that parents should limit their children hours of watching tv and playing computer games, but encourage to read books. Do you agree or disagree
Excess of everything is harmful and restrictions some time create bottlenecks. This statement is religiously true when it comes to practical life. Restricting kids for watching less tv or playing less digital games and motivating them for more reading books can develop negative impact. But yes I do agree to the fact that teens should be educated for reading more than spending time on tv or games. In the following paragraph, I will produce facts on my agreement.
Firstly, tv shows these days are full of violence and vulgarity which is always risky for growing kinds and they get influenced soon from such content. For example, streaming channels like Netflix and HOBB have no censor board to control the kind of content they are putting on air and these channels are very much accessible to kids and thus vulnerable for kids. So this always been favorable in all circumstances that kids should be restricted with hours and the kind of content they watch on tv.
Secondly, computer games have become so addictive for kids that they even play games till in the night and that too by compromising their studies. On top of its games like Blue whale and PUBG are inspiring kids to commit suicide. In some countries, a great number of suicides have been recorded and the government had to put a ban on such games. So this is never been a good idea to even allow kids to play computer games.
On the other hand, books always enhance knowledge and help kids to become good citizens. Reading books never been expansive and have great accessibility. There are so many autobiographies of successful people available that can inspire kids to become successful and they can contribute to building a good society.
To conclude the argumentation stated above reading books is always a better option than spending time watching tv or playing a computer game. So we should develop the right attitude among kids to opt for the better option.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 372, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'been'.
Suggestion: been always
...s and thus vulnerable for kids. So this always been favorable in all circumstances that kid...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng kids to opt for the better option.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84592145015 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62555320493 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546827794562 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7568535006 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3529411765 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4705882353 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41176470588 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175008485712 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575120596411 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578499982623 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985765429911 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468393213016 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.