Nowadays, more and more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face. Is this a positive or negative development?
Social media has become an integral part of human life. It has not only influenced human behavior but also uplift the social life of an individual. This has happened due to technological advancements, as a number is social sites are available to contribute in our day to day life be it decision to buy something or chatting with friends. Personally, socializing online has added advantages and this is a constructive development. In this essay, information and evidence are provided to clarify my point of view.
To begin with, Facebook, as we all know Facebook and spend all most 10% of day on this site. Facebook has made keeping relationship live very convenient as we can share our happiness or sorrows with our loved ones on a single click. For example, I have celebrated my birthday and shared live streaming on my Facebook account, it took me to surprise there were 150 friends of mine who enjoyed my celebration and blessed me. Secondly, matrimony sites are helping people to find suits for themselves. In a recent survey happened in India proved that 70% of marriages are happening through online portals. This proves the progression of online socializing. Lastly, not to forget Whatspp, this has changed the way we communicate with friends and families. Allowing people to make groups of friends and communicate with them freely by sharing photos, videos, and text messages.
However, mingling online is very easy, but there are lots of threats too. People make fake profiles and do frauds. This is the reason, few philosophical people advocate online mingling as negative development.
To conclude, there is no reservation about the positive side of the development of online socializing, only need is to be vigilant as this vulnerable to frauds.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07216494845 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90083626376 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59793814433 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0109827449 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8235294118 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1176470588 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.70588235294 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166137851991 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588823479757 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487317022726 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11368683584 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313460680655 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.