Nowadays, more people are choosing to socialise online rather than face to face. Is this a positive or negative development?
Technology today has brought a radical change in the way human beings socialise. People these days prefer to spend most of their time online instead of spending it the old traditional way. According to me, this is a negative development as it not only impacts the physical health of human beings, but also puts them into isolation.
One major drawback of socialising online is that its after effects on health can be hazardous. Individuals who constantly use online platforms usually complain about severe eye burning caused because of strain. Also, in some cases they have reported about their eyesight getting poorer. Moreover, these socialising applications are making people lazy as they prefer to stay at home instead of going out, which in turn, makes them obese. A recent survey conducted by Indian Institute of Technology (Mumbai) revealed that individuals who stay connected through online platforms are more prone to get lifestyle diseases, impacting their visual ability and general health.
Another negative impact of socialising online is that it is creating a huge communication gap between people, because of which they are getting isolated. They are getting less accustomed to meet their relatives and friends physically. This eventually, is making them feel deprived of human touch and it makes them feel alone. In some cases, this feeling of getting separated leads to mental illness and there is a greater risk of people getting depressed. One biggest proof of this is that in October 2018, Psychological department of Los Angeles community hospital revealed that the number of cases related to mental health increased substantially. When asked, most of the patients said that they spend most of their time on facebook and instagram.
To conclude, though most of the human beings today are more interested in staying connected online, this practice has caused a detrimental impact on their well being. It has affected their physical health and put them in a cut off mode. And as stated earlier, I firmly believe, this is a negative development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...of spending it the old traditional way. According to me, this is a negative development as it n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elieve, this is a negative development.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, well, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24624624625 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69791701757 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8276206254 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.764705882 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5882352941 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.82352941176 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144575790511 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04669574106 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377083838244 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937579770726 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00698325326233 0.056905535591 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.