Nowadays, more people are choosing to socialise online rather than face to face. Is this a positive or negative development?

Essay topics:

Nowadays, more people are choosing to socialise online rather than face to face. Is this a positive or negative development?

These days, people have opted the advanced technology to create a virtual social life online, and it is the preferred way of communication instead of having one to one conversation. In my opinion, I believe that it is negative development because it may lead to various kind of physical and mental problems with disappearance of social bonds within society.

One of the serious concern is that it would decrease social physical interaction to that level where relationships may start disappearing. In other words, people start spending most of their time on internet, and have little time available for the interaction with the persons in their surroundings. Thus, those persons would develop the feeling of being ignored in their minds which might lead to the breakage of relationship bonds.

Another problem that may arise it the direct effect on the physical and mental well-being of human and it might start affecting with serious effects because more time would be spent online, and no time is being devoted to exercise and other physical activities. Consequently, the fitness level of a person will start decreasing. For instance, a latest survey conducted by London University revealed that 72% of the population in UK is suffering from the eyesight defects and backbone problems due to overuse of smartphones and computers.

Besides, the confidence level of a people might start loosing when they have to face real-time situations of having conversation with number of people at a time because they become habitual of having communication over social media applications and websites, and they are not used to offline communications. To simplify it with example, it is common for people to have chatting on face book or whats app by using smileys and other shorts forms of words which ultimately would make difficult for them to have a formal talk with anybody. Therefore, society would have to bear major setback with these problems and people.

In conclusion, technology has made it possible to connect with the people overseas within seconds, but excessive use of this technology in daily routine life would have harmful effects on society as well as individuals itself.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 344, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...on will start decreasing. For instance, a latest survey conducted by London Unive...
^
Line 7, column 395, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...people to have chatting on face book or whats app by using smileys and other shorts f...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, in my opinion, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20056497175 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84588362245 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533898305085 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.4542540459 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.416666667 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5833333333 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.087969751208 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.030546252285 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0275215700359 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0483309713104 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234328934775 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.