Some people think that libraries are a waste of resources and money so computers should replace them. However others do not agree.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Although, it is sometimes believed that spending on the libraries is wastage of funds and resources, and these ought to be replaced with computers. In my opinion, I consider that replacement would not benefit society and could have more drawbacks than benefits.
On the one hand, libraries are an important source of information, and huge collection of books, magazines, journals and newspapers. This source can be easily accessed, and at free of cost. Students studying in college and universities consider library as temple of knowledge. Moreover, libraries provide quiet and calm sitting arrangement which encourage readers to study for longer hours, and it may not be possible with computer screen. Numerous websites related with research papers, for instance, could be accessed free of cost in the library computer section, which otherwise would be too costly for a student to subscribe at its own.
On the other hand, in the world of digitization, any kind of information could be obtained with the help of internet and computers. In other words, various electronic form sources such as e-books, e-journals and e-newspapers are replacing the old conventional printed material. People can easily access and download these sources of information within seconds on their smartphones and laptops without visiting libraries. These days, many companies have manufactured special kind of electronic gadgets like tablets and kindles particularly for reading books and other online information in best possible way.
In conclusion, computerization has achieved a remarkable level in replacing the printed form of information into electronic
form, but even then it is failed to completely replace the libraries. Therefore, it is still worth to invest funds on libraries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 587, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the best'.
Suggestion: in the best
...ding books and other online information in best possible way. In conclusion, compute...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nted form of information into electronic form, but even then it is failed to comp...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, may, moreover, second, so, still, then, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53676470588 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99628518561 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613970588235 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2760108641 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.846153846 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6153846154 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10325564918 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363847436828 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.020052134908 0.0667982634062 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0543805533118 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213620646717 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.