Some people think that libraries are a waste of resources and money so computers should replace them. However, others do not agree. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
In the age of computers, it has become increasingly tough to sustain traditional methods of reading. The availability of a plethora of books on the internet has led people to believe that libraries are a waste of money and resources, while there are people who think otherwise. I strongly agree with later and this essay will elaborate on both views; followed by a reasoned conclusion.
To begin with, the internet today provides easy access to information on the go. It lets you choose from thousands of available options. Moreover, the technological idea like ‘kindle’ allows you to select and read online at your own comfort. Consequently, this convenience has let people to believe libraries as a waste of resources and money. However, everything that is available online cannot be trusted. Hence, online reading should be done under the guidance of the adults as much of the content is uncensored and sometimes spreads the propaganda.
However, the library is not only a place with the collection of books, but it is also a promoter of community reading. It allows people from all walks of life to gather and discuss over books. Therefore, it provides the opportunity for the people to bond over books. Furthermore, libraries help people to learn disciplined reading. The image of people reading in a silent environment totally engrossed in their books tells us the importance of discipline while reading. Moreover, while prolonged exposure to computer screen has a negative effect on the eyes, reading through books have none.
In the end, I would say that though the charm of visiting the library is petering out, its importance cannot be denied. For first, it not only taught us reading but also taught us to read in discipline and with the community.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1307.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02692307692 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92403577391 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569230769231 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1849116098 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1333333333 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16404655399 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540264386218 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619697575621 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0914056822831 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043615748653 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.