Some people believe that technology has made a man more sociable and others think that it has made us less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
It is often argued that the advancement in technology provides a medium of interaction among people, whilst others disagree and believe that the frequent usage of technology paves the way to an introvert personality. However, I agree with the former viewpoint in this essay and discuss both the opinions with examples.
The advent of the internet has bridged the long-distance communication gap between friends and families. As a result, one can connect to anyone and anywhere on this planet with the click of a button. Social networking site such as Facebook is a prime example of this, where individuals can follow the updates of their friends and interact with each other without any geographical barrier. Therefore, cutting-edge technology is a worthwhile tool to be socially active.
On the other hand, there are certain people who hold a different opinion and think that the excess use of technology deprives of real human interaction, which is an important aspect of every bond. For example, modern children prefer to spend their time playing mobile games rather than playing outdoor games. As a result, they do not get a chance to communicate with the children of their age by sitting at home all day long after schools. However, I believe that human interaction is still possible by playing online games such as chess and pool with friends and playing these games also improves the level of cognition. In addition to this, individuals can also join the online groups of their interest to share their ideas and thoughts with each other. Therefore, this essay disagrees that technology should be dismissed for this reason.
To conclude, while technological advancements keep people closer and socially connected, some still feel that it as a reason for a communication gap. However, as long as we are careful about its right usage, the social benefits are clearly positive.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15584415584 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77458194001 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8371289839 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.428571429 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116338163674 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0393537823947 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429473861125 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0769280042446 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414552010498 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.