Some people believe that university education should only be offered to those who can pay for their own courses and the government should not be expected to fund higher education. To what extent do you agree ?
In a number of countries, those at university have their degree courses funded by the government but many people nowadays assert that students should pay themselves. Whilst there are many reasons to justify such a viewpoint, I don’t entirely agree with it.
Firstly, the benefits of having a well-educated population are felt by all those in society. This is because the general population gains when there is a ready supply of good doctors, engineers, teachers and businesspeople who can contribute to the welfare of all. Therefore it seems fair that all members of society should contribute though a tax system in order to pay for such education.
Furthermore, it is important that those who train to undertake such roles are the most able and competent in the country. Should education be too expensive, it is likely that some of the most capable and talented young people may be discouraged from studying, especially if they happen to come from poorer background. Indeed, if the tax system is organized so that those earning more pay a higher level of tax, then probably most graduates will pay back a good deal into society over many years of work. Their education will help them get better employment so they will probably contribute more money over a lifetime.
It is also important to remember that an educated and cultured society is a civilized one and, in principle, I belive that education should be available to all young people and that their financial background should not hold them back.
In conclusion, while some people argue that government money should not be spent on the university education of individuals, I disagree entirely. I feel that society as a whole benefits from supporting students in higher education so the government should fund these costs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...o can contribute to the welfare of all. Therefore it seems fair that all members of socie...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 51, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'undertaking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: undertaking
...e, it is important that those who train to undertake such roles are the most able and compet...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, while, i feel, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07432432432 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.789935148 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554054054054 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9937164612 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.166666667 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381562759877 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131234513398 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872339892704 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212386125759 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663847039767 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.