Some people believe that the women should play an equal role as men in country’s police and military fierce, such as army, while others, think women are not suitable for these king of work. Discuss and give your opinion.
Nowadays, more women are joining in nation’s military and police forces and have contribute significantly at both war sites as well as civil regions. However, some people believe women can’t work in these forces due to physical hardships. In the following passage, I will explain the important needs for women to be employed before declaring my stance.
At present, increasing number of women showing interest to work in country’s military force is an eccentric change happening in our country. As they undergo various trainings to empower them to work in any situations gives you both mental and physical stability to embrace the challenges. For instance, in US military force many women have played vital role during Iraq war. This shows that they are capable enough to work in war sites. In addition, for both army civil and administration departments are employed with women employees. Therefore, even though there is enormous physical strain in the war sites, with the advance training programmes will aid them to work any locations.
Furthermore, women play a significant role in police forces as they need to handle women offenders. For example, a recent robbery case in Chennai, 2 women were suspected, and taken to custody, in such instance women police are effective used to interrogate them to prevent from any sensitive issue if they were handled by men police team. Moreover, it is believed that they have better view in analysing criminal cases. Thus, it is assumed women are greatly required to handle woman criminals and to investigate the case with different approach.
To conclude, few decades ago, people were hesitant of women joining nation’s military forces, but the situation has changed, where they are trained to work any situations and they can contribute effectively too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'contributed'.
Suggestion: contributed
...s;s military and police forces and have contribute significantly at both war sites as well...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...tribute significantly at both war sites as well as civil regions. However, some people bel...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26804123711 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80963090361 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594501718213 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8473256636 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300233658501 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109132460957 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695741069099 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182975828551 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464092680435 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.