In the modern world, man’s quality of life has been drastically enhanced, because of various life-altering benefits brought by the internet. It is commonly believed that the young can benefit tremendously from a variety of information on the web. However, some information may have adverse impacts on them.
It is reasonable to believe that online information is useful to most teenagers. First of all, young students are able to expand knowledge in different domains, including science, mathematics, arts and other fields, by searching for relevant online information. It is beneficial to their academic study. In addition, a range of online information also plays a significant role in informing young people of everyday occurrences. For instance, they can visit a series of websites to find interesting topics such as national or international news stories, which could promote their understanding of the trend or mainstream of the world.
On the other hand, it is worth mentioning that the young can also be negatively affected by a massive amount of unlimited information. Firstly, a large number of web pages which contain the information related to many anti-social actions could make the youth develop a tendency to commit offences, as most of them are psychologically and mentally immature, and have no self-discipline, thereby prone to a series of temptations. Furthermore, reading too many political articles increases the likelihood that a young person will become extremely radical since they cannot consider arguments or content in a comprehensive or objective way.
To conclude with my opinion, it is unquestionable that the young are able to obtain from a wide range of online information. However, some online information could also cloud young people’s judgment social norm and therefore mislead them. Overall, the upsides outweigh the downsides.
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
The topic is generally about 'the youth', while you were discussing 'teenagers' and 'young students' in the second paragraph.
Definitions of 'teenager'
noun
a person aged from 13 to 19 years
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 289 350
No. of Characters: 1539 1500
No. of Different Words: 177 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.123 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.325 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.077 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 119 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 98 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 69 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 45 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.643 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.506 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.338 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.338 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.082 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ount of unlimited information. Firstly, a large number of web pages which contain the information...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49826989619 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21442671746 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608996539792 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.7721271947 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27732441106 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897693438658 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744516299642 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160839800964 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419278991565 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.