In modern society, it is unquestionable that parents play a significant role in forming their children’s overall personality. However, some people believe that it is appropriate for schools to educate young students about the ways of being an effectual parent. I disagree the view in some circumstances. The following paragraphs will discuss the view and the essential skills to be a good parent.
It is crucial for young students to learn the ways of being a well-qualified parent at schools. Educating students about parenting skills enables them to familiarise with family commitments so that students can develop the insights on adult responsibilities at the earlier stage. Therefore, they will be poised to deal with a series of domestic problems that they will encounter in future.
On the other hand, it is also argued that it is not suitable to learn such skills in schools. Firstly, most teenagers are psychologically and mentally immature. As a consequence, before stepping into the society, most teenagers are incapable of understanding the importance and responsibilities of being a good parent. Furthermore, schools should emphasize on the theoretical study. Learning parenting skills too early could impose a tremendous strain and emotional burden on students since it heightens the concerns about the future challenges and consequently distracts them from academic study, thereby resulting in a decline in their academic performance.
In my opinion, to be a qualified parent, an individual must have the ability to support their offsprings. For instance, most parents must have a decent job and earn a living from their occupation to provide children with many material possessions, and their children can, therefore, have an exhilarating time in their childhood. Moreover, parents should also have a good command of communication skills that allows them to express their opinions explicitly for their children to understand, and it can also help parents effectively resolve the disputes between the children within each family as well.
In conclusion, it is essential for people to obtain the knowledge about being a qualified parent. However, they should learn this skill after completing their studying career.
The flaws go here:
The flaws go here:
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524637681159 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
The e-grader is expecting: 200 Different Words when there are around 350 words.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 379, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...estic problems that they will encounter in future. On the other hand, it is also ar...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 390, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ems that they will encounter in future. On the other hand, it is also argued tha...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 393, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to parent'.
Suggestion: to parent
...size on the theoretical study. Learning parenting skills too early could impose a tremend...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 661, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... decline in their academic performance. In my opinion, to be a qualified parent,...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49855072464 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15116592246 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524637681159 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.0952924814 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.588235294 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2941176471 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05882352941 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298797404002 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106429245791 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07914919522 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184109402139 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646045037959 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.