Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole.Discuss this view and give your own opinion.

A section of society has been observed to prefer vegetarianism because they believe it good for the body and the earth. In my opinion, a person cannot stay healthy or save the planet by restricting the non-vegetarian diet. By staying vegetarian, he would become deficient in essential nutrients and would disturb the food chain; thereby, doing no good to the body or the world.

To begin with, the non-vegetarian food has essential nutrients that the plant world cannot offer and this is the foremost reason for believing it to be good for the health. Non-Vegetarian food includes chicken, meat, eggs, and fish. It has several health benefits because it is rich in protein and vitamin B. it not only strengthens the muscles but also keeps up body stamina and hemoglobin. Without qualms, if a person just relies just on plants then he would become deficient in vitamin B12, which is available only from red meat or would not have enough Omega-3 which is present only in fish. Thus, food derived from animal origin is equally important for maintaining good health.

Another reason for not restricting the non-vegetarian food is it balances the ecosystem. Admittedly, if animals like goats and sheep are not consumed by people then it may happen that their number grows drastically and an increasing number of these animals can be challenging to cope with. As a result, it is proper to consume non-vegetarian food along with vegetarian meals, which will keep their numbers in check.

On the other hand, vegetarian argue saying it to be a brutal act to kill animals for food. The animals should not be slaughtered when there are myriad of greens around to consume. Additionally, vegetarians opine their diet to be fat-free and the best choice for the fit body. Hence, according to critics; animal's life should be saved and fruits and vegetables should be consumed.

In conclusion, I pen down saying that the food from land and sea animals certainly is beneficial to overall health and eating just fruits and plants would make the body weak and deficient in essential vitamins. Moreover, the food chain and ecosystem can also be managed effectively if we include meat and fish in our diet.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'coping'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: coping
...ber of these animals can be challenging to cope with. As a result, it is proper to cons...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1828.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9539295393 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72698488437 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542005420054 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8381815618 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.555555556 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151108618599 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051495843424 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357371601514 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0829143932567 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540742403751 0.056905535591 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.