Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Waste recycling is one of the most widely discussed issues around the globe, especially among the environmentalists and concerned bodies, and even after numerous global initiatives and continuous announcements, people seem to react whimsically to this exercise. Many opine that people have a tendency to abide by a responsibility only when there are rules and legal obligation and this is why waste recycling should be a legislation and mandatory to adhere to and I also agree with this group.
To begin with, waste recycling is a great way to save the environment and reuse many valuable materials. Some household garbage contains detrimental ingredients and can cause harm to the surroundings and can pollute the environment. If every house owner takes the responsibility to participate in the waste recycling, the waste management as well as preserving a green environment would become easier. However, this is not the case and many people still ignore this. Thus comes the question whether making it a law would force people to participate more and save the environment? I believe this will.
It is natural that people have a tendency to ignore many important tasks - be it for themselves or for the society as a whole. They are sometimes as careless as crossing the busy streets instead of taking the overpass or underpass, though the later one is safer. On the contrary, when legal obligations and punishment for an act are in place, the number of participants seems like increases dramatically. For instance, when crossing busy streets instead of using the underpass in some cities have been made a legal offence, the number of road accidents decreased significantly over the time. In a similar way when a government would make the recycling mandatory by imposing laws, people would participate more to this. This is so sensitive an issue that this should have already been a part of the law.
In fact, the main objective of the law is to deter people from doing something bad and punish the offenders in order to maintain a peaceful society. Since waste recycling is directly related to our environment and the well-being of our future generation, we should make it a legal responsibility so that people do not ignore this important issue.
In conclusion, law and rules exist to encourage and force people to follow the good trends and avoid bad practices. Since people are not spontaneously participating waste recycling and the amount of garbage is increasing, the government must have defined rules and legislation to control it for the benefit of all.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-22 | ndbro17 | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-22 | ndbro17 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-27 | Hanachan123456789 | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-17 | Shraddanand | 73 | view |
| 2020-02-24 | saipriyanka | 73 | view |
- Some people think that watching sports in one's free time is just a waste of time. 73
- Young drivers are careless and overconfident, and too many are killed in accidents. To eliminate this problem, we could teach children the skills of safe driving while they are at schools. 67
- The best way to learn English is to study with native teachers What do you think about this opinion State your point and give reasons and examples to support your answer 87
- When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration for many. Others, however, prefer different other aspects of a job over the salary they earn. 67
- Many people want their country to host an international sporting event. Others believe that international sporting events bring more problems than benefits. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: WHETHER[5]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "the question"?
Suggestion: whether
...ny people still ignore this. Thus comes the question whether making it a law would force people to p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 593, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "In a similar way" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... decreased significantly over the time. In a similar way when a government would make the recycl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2154.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 423.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09219858156 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99110167217 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505910165485 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 703.8 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3435606726 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304638337373 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092746872579 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597733771901 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17830673061 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204034351457 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.