Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Nowadays it became difficult to have a pollution free environment. Some people think waste from homes is not recycled and have a perception that it is the responsibility of government to initiate laws against the waste management. I think this argument is correct to its extent and I will explain my reasons in the following essay.
On one hand, people are not educated with the recycling process and waste management. Indeed, they are unaware of the health issues caused due to producing huge waste and not recycling it properly. Accordingly, people are leaving it to the government to keep it in implementation. Instead, they must educate their children and teach them the benefits of reusing the plastic, polyethene covers and paper and so on. For example, the broken toys of kids can even be burnt and give it to a shape of ball or cube and in return it becomes another new toy.
On the other hand, government should introduce certain laws regarding recycling process. Also, it should initiate rules regarding trash like separating the waste into different bags based on the type. For example, placing the spoiled vegetables in one cover, papers in one bin and so on. This will help the government to reduce its effort in recycling process. At the same time, the authorities must take proper action on offenders who do not follow these rules by assigning penalties and if they repeat the things it is even better if they are punished by keeping in prison.
After having considered all the above discussed points, we can finally draw a conclusion that educating people towards the problems caused due to neglecting and producing huge wastage would be the best way to reduce effort on government. It is also better to produce laws related to the recycling process which will keep human to be aware and practically implement the recycling methods.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, finally, if, regarding, so, then, for example, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92971246006 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69701552869 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55910543131 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0923845644 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.866666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302157292816 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100671624161 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960629451458 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184221820271 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560046522568 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.