Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Household waste has become a global issue in the recent times. Some people are of the opinion that the best way to increase recycling is by authorities to come up with certain decrees. This essay strongly supports this view and it will explain with valid examples in the subsequent paragraphs.
Most of the People do not come with a sense of responsibility towards garbage collection and even prompt disposal. This is because there is no strict punishment against garbage which is recklessly thrown around or causing stench in the society due to not separating wet waste and dry waste. Therefore, the government must make strict laws for recycling household waste and if any individual does not follow the rules then the government should take legal action against them. This would certainly help in facilitating waste recycling. For instance, in line with the current new policy introduced by the government of India, there is a monthly fee of one thousand Indian rupees for collecting the waste from outside of individual’s home and if, the waste is not segregated into wet waste and dry waste properly in dustbin then there is a penalty of five thousand Indian rupees. This kind of a strict law would certainly make recycling household waste far speedier.
Furthermore, how can people hold the government accountable? as they themselves are at fault largely. The governments main contribution can surely come in the form of educating, by holding large campaigns, free lectures etc., for its citizens to enlighten them about the health hazards faced due to rubbish rotting around without being recycled. Like for instance Kitchen garbage (biodegradable) could be separated from non-biodegradable waste. This way one could even start a vermiculture bin of his own to produce manure and compost waste. These kinds of large scale crusades can only be taken to a successful level only with the governments intervention.
To conclude, recycling household waste is solely the responsibility of the government which seems to influence the people largely. The stringent measures adopted by the government would certainly make the world a cleaner and greener place.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 888, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'a' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
...ty of five thousand Indian rupees. This kind of a strict law would certainly make recycli...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...people hold the government accountable? as they themselves are at fault largely. ...
^^
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “as” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...people hold the government accountable? as they themselves are at fault largely. ...
^^
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hten them about the health hazards faced due to rubbish rotting around without be...
^^
Line 5, column 634, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ken to a successful level only with the governments intervention. To conclude, recycling...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24425287356 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92556820683 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568965517241 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.9295933648 49.4020404114 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.352941176 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4705882353 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76470588235 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277998897196 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834630296853 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632784845277 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159575488176 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424755062523 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.