Some people claim that public museums and art galleries are not needed because people can see historical objects and works of art using a computer. Do you agree with this opinion?
Although, today, we have several places of entertainment such as cinemas, amusement parks, aquariums and so on but Museums and art galleries are the part of society since civilization. Public Museums and art galleries are the major source of tourist attractions around the world. However, it is commonly believed by many that such attractions are not needed because we could see ancient objects and piece of art on computer. I completely disagree with their belief. This essay provides strong reasons for my disapproval.
First of all, no matters how advance our technology is, we could not have a look and feel of any thing on computer. This means computer generated 3D or 4D pictures could be a replica of historical objects but still the personal experience that we could have after visit a museum is incomparable and far better. For example, we could feel the texture of whale fish's bones which are kept on science museum in New york and this thing could not be achieved by computer graphics.
Another major reason for the need of museums and art galleries is that, they preserve the precious treasures for exhibition and display. They provide us with enormous amount of information that helps in research work and further developments. It is the least we could do to pay visit and gain some information about those valuable assets. Moreover, these museums provide great source of income to state in the form of tourism. In a research conducted by Harvard University in 2016, it was found that cities with large number of museums and art galleries have 50% more tourism income than other cities. Not only that, museums also provides employment opportunities to number of people like museum guides, artists, security personnel and so on.
To conclude, museums and art galleries are as essential as any other entertainment attractions like cinemas, water-parks. They share the historical information in a reliable way and offer an opportunity to personally see the ancient objects and art works. They are the great source of information and provide numerous benefits to the society in terms of income, employment and preserving the ancient heritage of our society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
Suggestion: anything
...s, we could not have a look and feel of any thing on computer. This means computer genera...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d not be achieved by computer graphics. Another major reason for the need of mus...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...with enormous amount of information that helps in research work and further devel...
^^
Line 7, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty personnel and so on. To conclude, museums and art galleries are as essenti...
^^
Line 7, column 162, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a reliable way" with adverb for "reliable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
.... They share the historical information in a reliable way and offer an opportunity to personally ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, look, moreover, so, still, for example, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1823.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10644257703 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77475830209 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53781512605 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5054443897 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.235294118 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17647058824 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279978626582 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085298226278 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550630008469 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163388691791 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669823784795 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.