While Purchasing cheap products and receiving services on reasonable prices is increasingly popular among a group of people, I strongly believe that the quality of products and services should be considered as the most primary factor by all people since by opting goods only for the sake of their prices, people's money and time might be wasted and even their health will be in danger seriously.
Firstly, by choosing products and services based on merely their price people are more likely to waste their money as well as their time since the quality of cheap products might suffer considerably and it means they are not durable ,so people have to throw them away and spend extra money to replace them with new products. For example, I bought a laptop some years ago on a totally reasonable price and I was delighted on that time but after one year I had to purchase a new one since it did not work properly. In this case, If I had bought a more qualified laptop at first, I could save my money.
Secondly, there are some circumstances when the cost of service or item becomes an irrelevant consideration such as medical treatments. For instance, if somebody chooses a non- professional surgeon to operate a nose job only because the hospital offers good prices, it might lead to a having an undesirable nose for rest of his/her life. Thus, people should choose services based on mature consideration since sometime it is can create a disaster.
To conclude, although price is an essential factor to consider when it comes to buying products, I say people ought to choose wisely based on quality of products and services in order to prevent their money and time to be wasted and also ovoid life threatening consequences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 233, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...erably and it means they are not durable ,so people have to throw them away and sp...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79865771812 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63912040905 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563758389262 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.2975951904 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.641219493 49.4020404114 206% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 178.75 106.682146367 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.25 20.7667163134 179% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.75 7.06120827912 209% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185645774986 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834369411193 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631430297971 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121982009497 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272361020101 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.0946893788 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.92 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 11.3001002004 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 27.5 9.78957915832 281% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.1190380762 166% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.