Presence of public libraries in our society has become a topic of debate these days. While many people believe that these establishments are useless due to prevalent internet, others consider that they still have a key role in the community. Although internet retireves maximum essential information for us in fraction of seconds, I think libraries still cater to non-digitalised knowledge and the information gained there is legitimate.
On the one hand, others consider that internet has all the essential knowledge that mankind need these days. For example, after getting navigation tools on our mobile phones, we hardly go to libraries to check routes and landmarks needed for our itinerary which these old establishments used to keep for the benefit of public in the past. Similarly, unlike past, internet has become a great source of information on the go. Consequently, busy people consider visiting libraries as a waste of time.
On the other hand, it is believed by others and I think that libraries are still part of our culture because the ancient knowledge contained in old books is yet to be transferred to digital platform. For instance, when many of the foreign anthropologists visit India to study its heritage, they connect dots for their desired project by reading rare books available in Indian libraries. Often these books are difficult to understand, as our languages were not developed in old time. For this reason, information in these books is neither found online nor others can modify it to claim their copyright. As a result, the wisdom that we get from a book always remain legitimate to it's boundaries. Also, this rare knowledge may reveal some special facts for these human history learners.
In conclusion, though libraries are not essential for our daily needs these days, I think they help others to dig in to our past. The knowledge gained from our past may surely reveal something that would result beneficial for our future generations
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, may, second, similarly, so, still, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20504731861 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83888887975 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555205047319 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2095426238 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19941387711 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776353060403 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054869814356 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140641371085 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844849836779 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.