Some people feel that public money should not be spent on cultural amenities such as museums, theaters and art festivals. How important do you think these things are to society as a whole? Are there any areas which are more important for the government to fund?
Smart spending of a municipal budget is by no means the crucial part of people’s satisfaction. Though it could different concerns appear regarding focusing areas of investments to a cultural object doing by authorities. In this essay, I would like to overview both scenarios of budgeting and try to suggest what is more important for the authorities.
Foremost, a lot of questions are initiated when money has been spent to the museum, art gallery or theaters. In my opinion, the allocation of some sources to create and develop such cultural staff is obligatory for the government in terms of severe importance for citizens, regardless of the sum of budget. The strong cultural environment allows improving an individual and a common level of literacy among inhabitants. Keeping a focus on the development of non-business activities, authorities could be sure that many city dwellers are able to fulfill their free time. From another side, this funding to some extent leads to establishing a smart and viable population in the future, engaging more young people to the culture.
However, still, other variable touch points exist which is help needed. It seems like an infrastructure, medicine, transport are also very important for any country and city. All these correspond to the basic needs and, for sure, are more important for people living in a large dwelled territory. Country leaders, as well as financial institutes, should realize the high importance of that, and they should invest even more resources developing those areas. In my view, a significant part of a budget should be spent to maintain all social objects, and afterward, the culture would benefit from the government.
To sum up, there is no denying that the cultural environment is one of the major areas of gratifying people, but above all the infrastructural, healthy and transport facilities have a higher concern. It is no means that the question of smart investment is not closed and requiring more focus from all sides.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ial part of people's satisfaction. Though it could different concerns appear rega...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, so, still, well, as well as, in my opinion, in my view, to sum up, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16564417178 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96374266084 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610429447853 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8900495207 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.266666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271310930317 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773827875556 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494960552982 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144777655437 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068901534054 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.