Some people prefer to raise children in the cities while others believe that children should be raised in the countryside.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Children can easily adapt to any environment. However, there is a view that childhood should raise in the cities while there is another aspect that the countryside is the best place to bring up children. Although, there are positive sides to both views. I prefer the idea that children should raise in the countryside. Let me outline the reasons for this.
City living is convenient in many aspects such as transportation, accommodation and healthcare. Therefore, for busy parents, it is easy to raise their children in the city. To elaborate, education and childcare facilities are increasingly common in metropolitan areas and working parents can easily arrange such services to their children. Moreover, standards of schools, quality of education, and healthcare facilities are in good condition compared to villages.
Nevertheless, when it comes to healthy foods and good environment, there is no better place than the countryside to raise up children. In fact, calm and easy-going village lifestyle help to develop good manners and virtues of children. Conversely, if children were to bring up in towns, they would have to spend a good amount of their time in a limited space, which can detrimentally affect their health and well-being. Additionally, in many cases children can live with their grandparents when they are in the countryside. Which in fact an excellent opportunity for them to enjoy their life.
Although there are fewer facilities in the village, living in a good and happy environment is crucial for children.
In the final analysis, although cities provide good facilities and convenience for parents, to bring up children, the countryside is the best place because of the calm and good environment and love of grandparents.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-07-05 | Sarab.rathor4@gmail.com | 78 | view |
2020-06-10 | virtualpathum | 73 | view |
2020-06-09 | virtualpathum | 87 | view |
2020-06-09 | virtualpathum | 61 | view |
- It’s good to have English as a global language. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Explain your reasons and include relevant examples from your own experience. 73
- More and more people are using a lot of online language translation apps. Are there more advantages or more disadvantages of such services? 73
- In the past museums stored information about culture and history However nowadays this information can be found through the Internet and therefore there is no need for museums Do you agree or disagree with this view 72
- People are getting over dependent on the internet and phones Is it a positive or negative development 78
- In many countries some students live with their families while studying but other students prefer to attend universities in other cities Do the benefits of living away from home outweigh the disadvantages 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...is the best place to bring up children. Although, there are positive sides to both views...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Let me outline the reasons for this. City living is convenient in many aspect...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, in fact, such as, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3082437276 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06467751991 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523297491039 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.6384241461 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5625 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4375 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251853215104 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963484549503 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100542117564 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152709674169 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110063824857 0.056905535591 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.