It is an obvious truth that a part of society avoid changing, while others are eager to make some changes in their life because of believing in a perfect effect that may cause. This essay deals with the arguments for and against this controversial topic.
On the one hand, there are a huge number of benefits for changes that should be considered. One of the most crucial advantages that changes can bring with themselves is about the pleasant. For instance, when I try to have a changes in my workplace, not only I do not feel inconvenience, but it gives me more satisfaction from myself. Another reason which appears so beneficial is earning the ability to adapt yourself with every situation without being afraid of being new to you. In addition, sometimes it can take you apart from depressing and variety of mental diseases.
On the other hand, However, a great deal of advantages is associated with changing, the awful aspects of that can not be neglected. Firstly, is about being stressed that some people are facing with new position or situation. Because of that, they prefer to stick on their exposition. Secondly, people who are oppose to changing strongly believe it is kind of taking risk which is not worth.
In conclusion, when it comes to changes, a majority of cons and pros come to my mind. In spite of having a lot merits, some people are avoiding that. whilst, some people prefer to see a bright side of the coin. Therefore, adapt on the above mentioned points, I am inclined to agree with the changes. Because, it makes more sense to me rather than following the old way. At last, it must be uttered that, if I have been able to start a new work, I would have do that.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a change' or simply 'changes'?
Suggestion: a change; changes
...asant. For instance, when I try to have a changes in my workplace, not only I do not feel...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...k on their exposition. Secondly, people who are oppose to changing strongly believe it ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 310, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'opposed'.
Suggestion: opposed
...ir exposition. Secondly, people who are oppose to changing strongly believe it is kind...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whilst
... merits, some people are avoiding that. whilst, some people prefer to see a bright sid...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 301, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... am inclined to agree with the changes. Because, it makes more sense to me rather than ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 459, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
... able to start a new work, I would have do that.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, apart from, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62582781457 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55357274025 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58940397351 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.180610552 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1764705882 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7647058824 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1176470588 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14103622453 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457604815253 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038572258279 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0852265120667 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231282649873 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.0946893788 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.