Some people prefer young leaders, while others think that senior
managers have the experience. What do you think?
There is a controversial opinion about youth empowerment and the experience of old managers. Some are of the belief that senior leaders are strongly required, others prefer young leader. In my opinion, youth are priceless for many reasons. These reasons will be discussed below.
Firstly, empowering youth is the key to develop any country. This is because they are proactive and have passion to learn. Although seniors have the experience, young men and women are able to work hard to gain knowledge. To illustrate, if we give the chance to youngers to take managerial positions, this will raise the awareness of education. Additionally, the skills transfer will be easier between the generations because it is an imperative key to success. Thus, if society pays more attention to youth, this will increase the productivity and the educational system.
Secondly, nobody can deny that the poverty level increases every year because of inflation. Youth empowerment is the solution to poverty eradication because this will decrease the unemployment and crimes. For example, the Swedish government decreased the retirement age to fifty years old, and they increased the pension rate. In other words, this encouraged the elders to hand over their duties to the new generation of managers. Consequently, if the governments and companies followed the Swedish experiment, there will not be criminals and non-working individuals.
In conclusion, young leaders are very important to any nation because they have the power rather than the passion for success, but the seniors should transfer the years of experience to them. I think young managers are the only way to evolve the world with a consultation of high-level management.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.375 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92605487736 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599264705882 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7283078097 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82352941176 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175474656295 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051839311951 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876583372902 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120706974931 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884697612348 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.