Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough time on learning practical skills. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.
In the modern era of education, it is irrefutable that students gain abundant knowledge on various educational aspects. Proponents opine that at all stages of educational learning, from primary education to tertiary education, a plethora of time is spent on learning theoretical axioms and lesser time on practical learning. This essay will agree and discuss the reasons why this trend is being followed by educational institutions.
First and foremost, the academic curriculum of current day education aims at providing theoretical and factual knowledge to candidates. In all learning stages, pupils experience more of bookish learning than practical knowledge. For instance, school examinations as well as university examinations, consist of more theory subjects exams than laboratory practical exams. By enforcing this kind of learning, students are stuck within a circumference and unable to think beyond scope. Furthermore, they are restrained from any practical experiences of learning and are used to learning by facts.
Secondly, the academic syllabus remains the same for many years until the Government notifies a new syllabus change. This has adverse effects on the learning standards children as they are restricted to the same curriculum that was imposed years ago. To give a clear example, my brother at present studies the same syllabus that I studied eight years ago. This serves as a major drawback since there are a lot of updated developments and changes that are happening every day. To add on, learning the same old curriculum makes them by-heart and reproduce in examinations which is not a favourable condition as it limits the capabilities of creative thinking and learning new things.
To put it in a nutshell, it is clearly evident that pupils spend a lot of time learning factual descriptions rather than acquiring practical knowledge. It is believed that in the near future, updated curriculum and practical learning environment will be provided to students so that they excel with broad-minded knowledge in all walks of life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42990654206 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0204608879 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554517133956 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3462869337 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.2 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226165565137 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726731151182 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714608302811 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137594588075 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452876625422 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.