Nowadays, most of the curriculums concentrate more on teaching sciences as a basic material without any contact with a real application. Consequently, the students become aware with the rules and equations that will make them pass the exam successfully, but in my view, they lack for the practical experience which is the key to comprehend the facts that they have studied.
To begin with, without practical experience students cannot connect the facts with its applications. In other words, facts are so important but they become useless without applying them in a real experiment. One salient example to support this idea, most of the pupils nearly forgot everything they had studied during their secondary education due to the absence of any illustrative material that could clarify their syllabus. As a result of this, involving some practical skills, especially in tertiary education, is essential for a more effective method of teaching.
Furthermore, graduates do not succeed in finding convenient work due to a lack of practical experience. To clarify, they did not experiment with any real application at their universities, while the employers need a person who is at least slightly aware of how to do his/her duties without a continuous help. Hence, education platforms should pay more attention to the practical skills in the furtherance of fostering their graduates to acquire a job easily.
To sum up, neglecting practical skills would result in inevitable dire consequences due to the ignorance of the students with the possible applications and experiences that would help them in both their real and career life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, hence, if, second, so, while, at least, as a result, in my view, in other words, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33590733591 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99189684956 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586872586873 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.9569426084 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.2 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.7 7.06120827912 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0835036531244 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383679330554 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321436686854 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0498427276914 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261230585978 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.