Although citizens are always proud of their heritage and culture, they rarely visit the historical places and local museums in their countries, meanwhile, the majority of the visitors are foreigners. In this essay, I will discuss the factors that are responsible for this trend, and what the governments should do in order to overcome this issue.
On account of the fact that tourists attractions are considered to be an essential source of national income, most of their tickets tend to be quite pricey which discourage residents from visiting them. They prefer to spend their money on something more interesting such as cinemas, nightclubs, and entertainment or amusement centers. Furthermore, inhabitants find visiting museums so boring due to their awareness of their own history and their full cognition about the monuments and artifacts of their country. On the contrast, tourists not only are intrigued by foreign cultures, but they are also keen on gaining more information about different civilizations.
Countries should endeavor to make these historic sites more attractive to locals. Firstly, governments can reduce the entry fees for local residents in the pursuance of encouraging them to visit their own museums. Therefore, if people find the prices of these places more affordable, they will visit them on a regular basis. Moreover, they can induce schools to organize trips to historical places in an effort to instill the importance of history in the students' mindset. Hence, they will bring up generations of youth who value their own heritage and civilization.
To recapitulate, citizens may refrain from visiting local historic places because of the costly tickets and their strong knowledge about their history. Consequently, governments should exert much effort to attract residents' attention either by reducing the ticket's price or encouraging schools on taking their students to these sites regularly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 456, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...nstill the importance of history in the students mindset. Hence, they will bring up gene...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5033557047 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8649307978 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56711409396 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0446715778 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.153846154 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272570920592 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101227959455 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058533953328 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175799633984 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447791591303 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.