In recent years, the world witnesses an obvious rise in the rate of pollution due to the spreading of some detrimental gases. While some people believe that the vehicles are the major contributors resulting in this issue, others argue that the manufacturing process that takes place in various factories is the main source of this problem. In this essay, I will discuss both views with a reasoned opinion.
To begin with, cars produce a huge amount of injurious gases that affect people's respiratory system and cause hazardous diseases. To clarify, due to the existence of the automobiles nearly everywhere, people are more exposed to car emissions that can be one of the main reasons for decreasing the average lifetime. For example, based on one of the recent studies at California University, in Tokyo, being introduced to car emissions daily are as severe as smoking a full pack of cigarettes. As a result of this, most of the car industries had taken immediate action to mitigate car emissions to diminish its harmful effects.
On the flip side, the industrial prosperous has a negative investment in the increase of the number of deleterious gases all over the world. To clarify, because of the vast development in many industrial fields, substantial amounts of injurious gases are produced daily by many factories. As a result of this, not only will it raise the world's footprint, but it will also contribute as a major factor to the air pollution phenomenon. As a result of recent research, 65% of the people who are infected with lung cancer had experienced an enormous amount of carbon monoxide resulted from various factories.
To sum up, both car emissions and industries pollution are deleterious to every human being. However, on account that the car industries endeavor to find solutions for this problem, manufacturing processes will be the main contributor to this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...ult of this, not only will it raise the worlds footprint, but it will also contribute ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, for example, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08974358974 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86074884566 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560897435897 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0227820474 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.153846154 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219898778606 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077934542642 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422322259754 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126554659858 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178544198886 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.