Dear Mr. Smith,
I hope this letter finds you well. I am writing regarding the faulty information you wrote in the article that was published in the last week in The Pyramids newspaper. It says that transportation is not convenient in Alexandria and the streets are always crowded.
First and foremost, there is a variety of transportation methods in Alexandria. Since it consists of more than 5 million citizens, the government has supplied the city with numerous microbus stations in every district. Furthermore, the bus service is incredible too because it travels through some routes that are not accessible by any other transportation method.
In fact, not only will this wrong data influence the city's popularity, but it will also affect newspaper credibility. For example, many tourists may refrain from visiting Alexandria due to the untrue news about the poor transportation system. Moreover, Owing to the fact that vast numbers of readers seek to buy the most trustworthy newspaper, they will be extremely frustrated when they know that it includes incorrect information.
Finally, I wonder if the newspaper could publish an apology on tomorrow's edition in order to avoid people's criticism. In addition, an investigation about the town's transportation methods will be immensely beneficial to alter the published data to an accurate one.
Thanks a lot for your consideration.
Yours Faithfully,
Mark Ryan
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 64, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tomorrows'' or 'tomorrow's'?
Suggestion: tomorrows'; tomorrow's
...e newspaper could publish an apology on tomorrows edition in order to avoid peoples criti...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 159, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'towns'' or 'town's'?
Suggestion: towns'; town's
...In addition, an investigation about the towns transportation methods will be immensel...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, well, for example, in addition, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 4.92783505155 122% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 5.05154639175 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 32.9175257732 64% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 26.3917525773 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.85567010309 337% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1209.0 937.175257732 129% => OK
No of words: 223.0 206.0 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42152466368 4.54256449028 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.78020617076 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1266444325 2.54303337028 123% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 127.690721649 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.699551569507 0.622605031667 112% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 290.88556701 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.13402061856 66% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 16.3608247423 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6417746985 44.8134815571 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 76.5299724578 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1538461538 16.8248392259 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 4.34317383033 200% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.49484536082 268% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165700352561 0.216113520407 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052751852816 0.0766984524023 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464467556562 0.0603063233224 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0800189615244 0.12726935374 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047839348344 0.0580467560999 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 8.37731958763 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 70.7449484536 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 8.71597938144 159% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 7.59969072165 120% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 41.2886597938 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 8.62886597938 99% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 8.54432989691 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.