In this contemporary era, most of the parents are giving their child allowances that can be use for their expenses, which has a plenty of positive effect when they grow up. I firmly agree to this notion that kids would learn to value money if they get hold to it at a young age. In this essay, I will elucidate umpteen factors for aforementioned statement in following paragraphs.
To commence with, younglings are being taught by their guardians how to manage their finances. At their young age, they are already having financial allowances in a weekly basis to support their needs in terms of school activities. For example, school projects, excursions and extra-curricular activities which can give a child a beneficial result on how they could budget their money in a prestine way. Another, is that they could save some of their cash, if they would not use it which could also be usable when they wish to buy something they need in the near future.
In addition to this, teaching children about management of spending at a tender age would also mean that they would value their hard earned money in the future. In the sense that they would not spend their cash on useless things which could hurt them financially or even get them broke. As well as learn to be self-reliant when they become adult. This will be one of the best key aspect that they could acquire that would lead them to become a successful professional not just in a career oriented but also how they manage their own life.
To recapitulate, I would reiterate that kids nowadays should be provided pocket money. In order to grasp value for money and also be able to learn how to become an independent person when they become an adult in the upcoming years.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, for example, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 46.0 24.0651302605 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68852459016 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53465314022 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531147540984 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5578793397 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69230769231 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188531554274 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797468294167 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419986992001 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132315404595 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263981612071 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.