Some people say that children given pocket money every week will have lesser money problems when they become adults. Do you agree or disagree
In this day and age, most of the parents are giving their child allowances that can be use for their expenses. Which has a lot of positive effect when they grow up, I agree to this notion that kids would learn to value money if they get hold to it at a young age.
To start with, younglings are being taught by their guardians how to manage their finances. At their young age they are already having financial allowances in a weekly basis to support their needs in terms of school activities. Like school projects, excursions and extra-curricular activities which can give a child a beneficial result on how they could budget their money in a useful way. Another, is that they could save some of their cash if they would not use it which could also be use when they need to buy something they need in the near future.
In addition, upbringing children about finances at a young age would also mean that they would value their hard earned money in the future. In the sense that they would not spend their cash on useless things which could hurt them financially or even get them broke. As well as learn to be self dependent when they become adult. This will be one of the best key aspect that they could acquire that would lead them to become a successful professional not just in a career but also how they manage their own life.
In summary, I firmly agree to the notion that kids nowadays should be given pocket money. In order for them value money but also be able to learn how to become an independent person when they become an adult in the near future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a useful way" with adverb for "useful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...lt on how they could budget their money in a useful way. Another, is that they could save some ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 512, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut also how they manage their own life. In summary, I firmly agree to the notion...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, in addition, in summary, as well as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 44.0 24.0651302605 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1280.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.44444444444 5.12529762239 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26635857111 2.80592935109 81% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496527777778 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 388.8 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7819807327 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.666666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198992691766 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889125708158 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0560840427336 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14357584123 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454144060089 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 50.2224549098 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 12.4159519038 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 78.4519038076 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.