The tendency of news reports in the media is to focus more on problems and emergencies rather than on positive developments is harmful to individual and to the society as a whole. To what extent do you agree or disagree
In this day and age, most of the news companies are informing the populace on the predicament of their country. I agree to this notion because this will have a lot of negative impact to the perception of the society.
To start with, gathering information and informing people on what is happening is main job of mass media. Most of the data they gather though are perverse because it sells much better and easy to be remember than positive news. For example here in the Philippines media personality tends to mock the current President which is Rodrigo Duterte for his curse words and violent approach on the illegal drug problems in the country. Most people though tend to remember his bad side rather than the good side since that the brain of human remembers harmful information efficiently which has a lot of damaging effect to the young and old.
Moreover, journalist nowadays tend to create a lot of misleading facts about a certain person which could morally damage their personality. No matter how many good things they have done in the past if they have done a least one terrible thing then most of the people would look to the absurd things that they did. Which is why it is unfavourable that the news agencies tend to inform the public about the destructive news that will cause the citizen to criticize certain developments and ideas of that person.
In conclusion, I equivocally agree that the focus of mass media in problems rather than developments would be harmful to the people’s belief and ideology. They should change this customary into a pragmatic way and use it as a silver lining to help build a society which foster camaraderie.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...have done in the past if they have done a least one terrible thing then most of t...
^
Line 5, column 511, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... developments and ideas of that person. In conclusion, I equivocally agree that ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, so, then, for example, in conclusion, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80836236934 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60885578736 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550522648084 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.7061145175 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.454545455 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157041280181 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626642775432 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692219460629 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0986300736227 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668271558402 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.