Irrefutably, human's living standards have been rapidly enhanced by the multifarious life-altering benefits brought by economic blooming. Though some proponents surmise the end of impoverishment and starvation is possible with the economic surge, while others impose that the ramifications of financial growth could be fraught with environmental drawbacks. I totally accede with the former notion. This essay will discuss both view sides and enunciate my perception on these statements.
Firstly, In our newfangled society, Authorities are trying their best with lucrative ways of economic surge to end the poverty and starvation. Government policies provides enormous facilities, hobs and blooming infrastructure to its citizens to end the scarce means of food and money. For instance, Canadian government has done exemplary chores to alleviate the sparsely numbered regions of unemployed citizens by providing them employment which culminate in dwindling the number of poor and hungry people. I fully believe that the financial improvements of a society will surely help to minimize the pervasive gloomy conditions of digent societies.
However, The flourishing increase in economic status of our contemporary society will also cause detrimental effects in the environment. The general perceived idea behind the deteriorated environmental problems are the consequences of mammoth pragmatic increment in economic growth. To illustrate, China has substantially whipped his pessimistic environmental problems with the surge in their financial status and the same can be considered for America as well. Though I do not accede with the notion totally, In contrast, there are some protocols which governments needs to deploy when taking momentous decisions about economic development which relates to environmental conditions.
To recapitulate the aforementioned points, this essay discussed the both sides of the view and culminates the requirements of economic blossoming as well as natural environmental developments which could be a laudable initiative by government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... laudable initiative by government.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, so, well, while, for instance, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.97986577181 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27404673299 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630872483221 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.417511598 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.076923077 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158571929202 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535240227957 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480692210377 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955131949976 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296328620008 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.7 12.4159519038 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.