There subsists numerous ways of bringing people closer, out of which one is music. People feel that music cultivates a sense of togetherness, regardless of their cultural background or age. This essay will explore constructive arguments in the forthcoming paragraphs to support the above notion wholeheartedly.
Undoubtedly, music has a language of no particular country or region. People follow its rhythm more than words and therefore, music has reached national boundaries. Perhaps the best example of this would be Hoola concert that took place 4 years ago in the United States and the United Kingdom, which happened to raise funds globally, engaged international audience, and was a massive success. In addition to this, people from different countries are joining music schools to learn music. 'Violin Play' in China, a popular school, teaches international music to all its students. This is a clear evidence that shows music is a universal language.
Not only culture, but music has its exceptional ability to bind people together of different generations. Even if the people vary in ages, they enjoy the melody that have the same magical effect on them. This would explain why TV shows such as 'X Factor' and 'Music Talent' are so popular in America. These sources of entertainment attract incredibly broad audiences because singing appeal to children, parents and grandparents alike. It has been seen that all generations sit together at one place to enjoy the show together every Sunday. No other form of entertainment can bring families together in the manner like music do.
In conclusion, discussing the above salient features of music, clearly my opinion inclines over the statement that states music is an important part of life, and plays a significant role in uniting people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 528, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Violin Play in China, a popular school, teaches international music to all its s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26132404181 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83652799233 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658536585366 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1492685338 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.375 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6875 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255631543761 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858342369916 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728403963308 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148658178456 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558924192545 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.