Social media has gained a great deal of popularity in past few years. There are numerous platforms available in the market through which one's life can be completely exposed to the whole world. The positives of social media transparency outweigh the negatives and this essay will showcase that there is not much harm in publishing content of personal lives of celebrities.
Undeniably, we all look down upon our favorite celebrities and cherish even their single glance on social media. These people in some way or the other motivate us to follow them and through various media platforms we get to know them more. For example, my neighbor wants to become a wrestler and he gets inspired whenever he watch his videos. Not only it boost us to do good in life, but also provide entertainment. Apart from their reeled content, people find fun in their day to day life. For instance, during quarantine, what famous people are doing at their homes became he interest of their fans.
Nevertheless, with the above salient features, comes he popularity they earn through social media. There subsists many struggling actors who did not gain much appreciation in their carrier, however, by showcasing their daily activities in the media invited applaud for them, which exemplifies the above point. Additionally, giving up data of famous people aids the business of photographers, editors nd content writers. Many photographers are now employed to get clicks of celebrities outside gym, airports and their homes. Not only they get salary but also incentives for capturing high-ranked celebrities.
Although everyone in this world deserve their privacy but employment and inspirational factor far surpass the need of not having people's life transparent. At last, it should not be banned, however it can be minimized.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...s available in the market through which ones life can be completely exposed to the w...
^^^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'watches'.
Suggestion: watches
...estler and he gets inspired whenever he watch his videos. Not only it boost us to do ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'boosts'?
Suggestion: boosts
...enever he watch his videos. Not only it boost us to do good in life, but also provide...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 579, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'interests'.
Suggestion: interests
...ople are doing at their homes became he interest of their fans. Nevertheless, with th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, apart from, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21232876712 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7919340703 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654109589041 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2428337407 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.125 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116699583796 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382299846271 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354968599142 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0812562955415 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342465625846 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.