Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as Sahara desert or the Antartica
What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places?
Travelling has been a part and parcel in everyone's lives since ages. However, visiting difficult locations has come into picture in modern world. Nowadays people are more inclined towards going to tough places than easy ones. This essay will explore arguments stating the positives and negatives of going to such places to aid readers come to their own conclusion.
Undeniably, in today's world, everyone want to experience something unique. Therefore, to achieve another level of exposure, people travel to places such as Sahara desert or the Antarctica. With that, tourists came across different culture, food and weather, which fascinates them. Another reason that warrants favoring difficult locations is that some people are exhausted of city life and want to spend some time in isolation and realise how privileged they are. A recent news featuring an actor states that the person usually went to less crowded and hard condition places on holidays in order to find peace and understand self worth.
With the above salient features, disadvantages of visiting such places now merit some useful discussion. No matter how enticing these places look, risk factors are always associated with them. A person got hospitalized for a week because of elevating oxygen levels in blood while climbing to a mountain. Not only health issues, but also basic problem subsists. Since they are not proper tourists places, improper accommodation and food is the most expected. Sometimes inadequate network facilities are encountered which can make tourists unreachable to their families.
By and large, going to such places is a matter of choice and totally depends on individual. However, if give an opportunity, one should explore and enjoy the beauty of nature.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, therefore, while, such as, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35018050542 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65250849702 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671480144404 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4075183714 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1764705882 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2941176471 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.29411764706 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287952314867 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709789407904 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608106649303 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14716878034 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342050931076 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.