Nowadays is the commonly argued about which medium is the best to view films. While some school of though believe that it is convenient to watch it on our electronic devices such as phones or tablet, others opine that they are better enjoyed in a cinema. This essay shall discuss both views and provide an opinion.
Firstly, mobile phones have made it increasingly easy to access all the latest releases at the click of a fingertip. One can view the shows at the comfort of their homes or can even download and watch them while traveling. Secondly, some movies are available on the internet even before they are released in theaters, for it might have been leaked through some unethical sources. For instance, many multi-starer movies particularly the Avengers franchise face the wrath of piracy, as the audience is eager know the plot, especially the climax. Lastly, many prefer watching movies at home, because they are wary of crowded places. Therefore, mobile viewing is advisable.
Conversely, watching a film in cinemas is advantageous. To begin with, the visual effects and action sequence witnessed on the big screen is indescribable. It is difficult to capture the same exhilaration on a small screen, namely mobiles and tablets. Likewise, some movies require certain equipment's to watch and are released in a special format which is only available in theaters. For example, one needs to have 3D glares to watch 3D movies. Moreover, films are made with an intention to be viewed in cinemas and not on some cramped up devices. As a result, cinema's do full justice to the story.
In conclusion, I agree watching films on the big screen is irreplaceable, since there one can fully experience the emotions and essence of the movie. While viewing them on electronic devices may have their own benefits, cinemas will always make you better understand the movie and their characters.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, firstly, if, lastly, likewise, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01587301587 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68614578694 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587301587302 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4355441739 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7777777778 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1111111111 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208590986507 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624842371689 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599717229933 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128789862908 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498144984612 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.