Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in cinema.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Advancement in technology and invention of electronic gadgets such as smartphones, tablets and laptops offer plethora of benefits to each category of the society. Due to which, some people tend to watch movies on these gadgets. However, there are certain demographics of the society who believe that theatres are appropriate place to watch movies by considering contemporary features that theatres offer. This essay will analyse both viewpoints to present an opinion in a plausible way.
Firstly, watching a movie on electronic gadgets is less expensive than buying a movie ticket. For example, annual/monthly subscription of Netflix and Amazon Prime Video is far cheaper than a single movie ticket, especially for the students with limited pocket money. Secondly, It is convenient and time saving as well. As one need not to spend extra time and money on transportation to reach cinemas and stand in long waiting queues to get tickets. Lastly, one can watch any movie at any time or even pause the current playing and resume later. Therefore, flexibility is another factor for the popularity of this phenomenon.
On the flip side, proponents of latter viewpoint believe that certain features such as high quality sound, resolution, graphics and 3D effects can only be experienced at cinemas only. For example, 'Jurassic World' movie was filmed with 3D effects to look and feel dinosaurs realistically. Moreover, movie directors invest lots of money to create these effects for the audience. Therefore, It is expected from the audience to appreciate their work with real look and feel.
To recapitulate, It would be inappropriate to support one particular side. In fact, by considering the advantages, one should enjoy and appreciate both inventions for the entertainment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 468, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a plausible way" with adverb for "plausible"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e both viewpoints to present an opinion in a plausible way. Firstly, watching a movie on electr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spend'?
Suggestion: spend
...nd time saving as well. As one need not to spend extra time and money on transportation ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, lastly, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35714285714 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9798986423 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8013480169 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.75 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3125 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0925775399233 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0280455636431 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309695370987 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0538542356444 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0103601416023 0.056905535591 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.