Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Although it is sometimes thought that watching movies in cinemas can easily be replaced by phones and tablets, other people still find cinemas as the perfect place to watch a film. In my opinion, watching movies in the cinema is a far more enjoyable experience.
On the one hand, some people think that using a mobile phone or a tablet to see a film is suitable for the fast-paced life we live today. In other words, watching a movie on a mobile phone consumes less amount of time compared to cinemas. This is mainly because mobile phones are available with people almost all the time, and they can watch the movies they like whenever they are free. For example, an employee can watch a film on his mobile phone during his two-hour daily journey to his work, without the need to spend a complete evening to go to the cinema to watch the same film.
On the other hand, going to the cinema, according to some, is a richer experience, and I agree. The isolated environment inside the cinema helps the audiences to concentrate only on the film being played without any distractions. In contrast, people who watch films on phones or tablets can easily get distracted by any noise even if it is not so loud. Moreover, advanced sound systems and visual effects of modern cinemas can effectively mimic reality and provide the audiences with genuine adventures they cannot find in any other place. Like for instance, I-Max cinemas are designed using a combination of effects that even the most expensive phone or tablet cannot emulate.
In conclusion, despite the fact that smartphones and tablets could save time, I firmly believe that modern cinemas are irreplaceable, as they offer a perfect atmosphere for watching films.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nk that using a mobile phone or a tablet to see a film is suitable for the fast-p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, still, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83783783784 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53556694012 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537162162162 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5110169002 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.333333333 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289381321134 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115292253182 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564780392514 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172989647749 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687324801095 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.