In this era of technological advancements, children spend most of their spare time playing video games or on social media. Not getting involved in any physical activity or going out starts to take its toll on youngsters’ bodies as well as on their mind in the long run. Understanding these detrimental effects, some parents motivate their offspring to get involved in group activities such as summer camp, etc in their leisure time. While some may be in agreement with this thought, others may contradict and advocate giving space to the children so that they could engage themselves in their favorite activities.
Firstly, as children spend more time on computers than getting involved in outdoor activities, it becomes necessary for the parents to involve youngsters forcefully in outdoor activities. That way, a watchful eye can be kept on them, as well as they get a chance to socialize and to make new friends outside the virtual world.
Next, though the internet and various types of gadgets have become a crucial part of some children’s lives, we can argue that some children are still untouched by these worldly things and spend their free time gaining more knowledge. They find no joy in group activities and become miserable if forced to participate. Hence, a choice should be given to such children to spend their time as per their wishes.
Lastly, not all children’s nature is alike. While some of them may be introverts and prefer to spend their leisure time with their close friends, others may be extroverts and may like to attend social gatherings and activities. In both cases, parents should ensure to be not intrusive beyond a limit and respect their privacy.
In essence, youngsters should be handled as per their preferences and extreme measures should be taken only in the case of rigidness. In my opinion, they should be given a choice to select activities but regular checks also should be kept to know if elected activities are productive or utter rubbish.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 135, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...be taken only in the case of rigidness. In my opinion, they should be given a choi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, lastly, may, so, still, well, while, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05120481928 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78712454274 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55421686747 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5689600213 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.785714286 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310036276602 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118061597543 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644287824612 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179102053236 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877818480308 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.