Some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events. Is this a good thing or a bad thing?
Undoubtedly, every civilization predominantly and every nation specifically has an explicit sense of sporting and cultural predilection, where the members of such society or country propagate these inclinations through their diligent interest in the connected events. They spend hefty amounts on tickets in order to watch the ceremonies live, and cherish such experiences for a lifetime.
Moreover, an essential role is played by the media which covers the entire phenomenon and provides extravagant fame to these affairs. Apart from that, the people prepare themselves for such fete as long as months before their commencement. The closer the event arrives; the popular palaver about them gets stirred. The enthusiasts accordingly streamline their schedules in order to accommodate the festival days. In addition, they persuade others to participate in such festivals.
Not only these sporting and cultural events encourage healthy competition between the members of a society, but also evade those kinds of incidents that erode the roots of the civilization. Furthermore, these are positive trends being set for the future generations to take after. Likewise, Oktoberfest celebrated in Munich city of Bavarian Germany is an ideal paragon of such poise celebration. It stretches from sixteen to eighteen days which allures millions of people around the globe for contribution. Apparently, Oktoberfest has flourished the tourism industry of Germany to an unexpected level.
To conclude, it can safely be deduce that it is profitable and feasible to spend money for cultural and sport festivals. It not only nourishes the positive outlook but also dominate and promote the clement perception of society worldwide.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, furthermore, if, likewise, look, moreover, so, thus, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6332046332 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00837865364 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.644787644788 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2237705975 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.214285714 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105801954904 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0306947411054 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445854935575 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0686319713899 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393963972918 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.