Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community. They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole. Do you agree or disagree?
There is an opinion asserting that teenagers should be forced to do jobs without any income whenever they have spare time. It is believed that in this way both society and teenagers would be benefited as a whole per se. I completely agree with the given statement on the basis of some compelling reasons.
To begin with, mandatory unpaid work is beneficial for teenagers. Firstly, lacking experience and soft skills, these young people will get the chance to foster their qualities at earlier ages. This way, they do not have to wait until they graduate from college or university to gain experience in the workplace. Secondly, no matter what, these youngsters would already have much free time available to them. Therefore, it would be better to spend it wisely on things that help them promote growth by doing volunteer work, rather than just hanging out with friends or playing video games.
Additionally, these unpaid job prospects are useful for society as well. Although some would argue that teenagers might lack maturity and they would add more responsibilities and problems instead of solving them. I, however, think that it is a great opportunity to train the youth to develop their skills, in spite of not being mature enough. Here, we not only help them to improve their abilities, but also preparing them for harder responsibilities in the future. Employers also look for candidates who are experienced enough. Since all materials that young students learn at schools and universities are related to theoretical, which is not quite necessary for the job market most of the time, it is a great chance to do unpaid work when they are still students.
In conclusion, I believe that unpaid work in free time is considered a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for teenagers. And community will benefit from this phenomenon too.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, in conclusion, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06270627063 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80299266053 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620462046205 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0981135276 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.875 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386768799368 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107874025973 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766977253887 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23185411327 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755671345254 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.