Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
For many students, what field to study in university is a significant decision. While there is a strong argument that students should follow their interests, other people support the idea to learn some futuristic subjects. When it comes to me, I advocate the latter opinion by discussing both views of this issue.
To commence with, when following one’s interest, people have a chance to develop themselves to their max. According to psychology, students would gain considerable and swift development by spending the majority of their time and putting lots of effort into the subject that they love. Additionally, their ability considered carefully, students are certain to study an appropriate curriculum, which can reduce the feeling of stress and discouragement. As a result, they hardly drop out of school or decide to choose another subject. For example, my friend, following in the artistic field for a decade, recently has gained huge success by launching his first exhibition. In spite of those positive propositions, people suffer a difficult time enhancing their career path and choose to study what subject society needs.
Rather than wasting time and energy, students can make their academic and professional paths more stable by studying futuristic subjects. First, it is certain that the demand of workforce in future technology, science, and biology is a colossal upsurge, making students in those fields easier to find jobs. Second, Not only are they faster to grasp their first achievement, but they have an attractive chance to be promoted to higher positions when they work in the leading field. Moreover, because of the lack of skilled workers in those areas, people can receive a decent income that is much higher than the rest. For instance, recent news has shown that there are a huge amount of students registered in intelligent technology, biotechnology, artificial technology.
All in all, if all the factors are contemplated, we can easily reach a conclusion that learning what is in need outweighs learning what we are interested in.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 674, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...nt news has shown that there are a huge amount of students registered in intelligent t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, second, so, while, for example, for instance, as a result, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2696969697 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85461783348 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609090909091 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8303838075 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.933333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229453178342 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674913649043 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468461453167 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122818070576 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044246342843 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.