Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, each as those related to science and technology. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
While some individuals are of the opinion that majors at universities should be chosen freely by students, others, however, claim that the subjects have to be selected based on the future need of a society, such as science and technology. I, for one, believe that the former view is correct on the basis of some compelling reasons.
On the one hand, advocates of limiting students’ options for studying assert that the benefits accruing from it are by no means negligible. Firstly, automatization and industrialization have already begun. In other words, most job positions available today will be done by robots in the near future. Therefore, training future alumni for less pivotal fields of study, excluding science and technology, would result in huge redundances amongst young people. Second, the future world is subject to changes regarding scientific discoveries and cutting-edge technologies. Therefore, the more students are instructed in modern science and technological fields alike, the brighter future is for human evolution as a whole.
On the other hand, others put forward the argument that not allowing qualification seekers to choose their major defies both logic and morality. The most convincing reason justifying their assertion is that important majors, modern physics and IT technologies, would not pique all youngsters’ interests. For this reason, no full-fledged and inspired degree holder, who may even detest their field of study, irrespective of its future importance, would be trained per se. From morality point of view, it can be also against human rights. Simply put, it is of paramount importance that every person feels to have freedom of making their own decision in regard to their academic future.
In conclusion. I firmly believe it is self-evident that people have different tastes, and in turn, making them continue their formal education in a subject that they might not revel in, could not bring any benefit; even though that subject is considered more beneficial.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, in other words, in regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37974683544 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91889512079 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636075949367 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1303161742 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.428571429 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239588785804 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631775078266 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04939332139 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133480231886 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050887989757 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.