Some people think that big international sporting events are not worthwhile for the host country.
Do you agree or disagree?
The argument, over whether sports competitions at global-level are beneficial or futile for the hosting states, has not been settled yet; however, I completely disagree with the statement because international tournaments are a great source of revenue for the organizing country and it also opens employment opportunities for its citizens.
To embark with, the countries, where international events are organized, earn a lot of money. Firstly, it comes from several sources such as advertisement agencies who pay a hefty amount to sponsor these events, and in return get publicity and product recognition all over the world. Secondly, the audience who come to watch live matches spend a handsome amount to purchase tickets, and the cost of air travel, visa fee, and accommodation cost, provide benefit to host countries in the form of tax. For example, the Daily Times in the United Kingdom published a report that the government’s monetary status was boosted to fifty billion pounds in the Cricket world cup 2019.
What is more, jobs are created in the respective country due to the requirement of the huge labor force for the smooth running of the event. This workforce comprises of white-collar jobs such as engineers, doctors, security staff and, managers; whereas, blue-collar include cleaner, waiters, and helpers. For instance, Brazil has invited two thousand nationals to apply for full-time and part-time employment for the upcoming Olympics on an attractive remuneration. Therefore, more employed nationals work for the prosperity of the country and improve its economy.
To conclude, I disagree with the notion that big competitions are fruitless because it would lower the unemployment rate of the country, and it also helps in growth of the economy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 157, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...th running of the event. This workforce comprises of white-collar jobs such as engineers, do...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, such as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41366906475 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01623584814 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661870503597 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.4969464937 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.5 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 7.06120827912 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177751632884 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611054691041 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493438901537 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104356839151 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387271245126 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.6 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.