Some people think that companies and private individuals should pay to clean up the pollution that they produce, not the government. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Pollution control is the pressing issue for our nation and, the government should allocate some budget to wipe out contamination. Although some asserts it is the government responsibility to bear the expense of cleaning pollution, I, however, believe public or company should pay for cleaning it because they are mainly responsible for engendering pollution.
Firstly, the source of pollution is mainly household work and various firms and industries releasing toxic gases. While I concede that the government should not charge everyone to pay for cleaning pollution to their areas as most people can not even afford bread and butter for their family. The problem is people and organization will take it for granted and, they will not control the pollution caused by them. As a result, it will deteriorate our environment. For an instance, Taj Mahal was harmed by the industries set-up near river bank of Ganga, so they came under control when the government started penalizing them. Thus, imposing some amount is essential.
Further, the collection of trash and poor sewage system in many societies causes pollution and family owners are responsible for this. Many supporters of anti-cleaning program think the government will take care of their surroundings and beautification. This essay argues that it is the duty of dwellers to keep their area clean and green. In fact, they should not produce garbage and should deal by their own either by funding to the cleaning department or by doing self. Moreover, keeping locality polluted benefits no one.
To conclude, not only public should deal with the cleanliness issues by their own but also organization should pay for promoting pollution. Therefore, although I acknowledge that mandatory charge should not impose by the government, this essay disagrees that the government will spend on pollution engendered by citizens or the company.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-12 | rekharastogi | 82 | view |
- It has been said that reading for pleasure is better in developing imagination and language skills than watching TV To what extent do you agree or disagree 66
- YOU HAD BORROWED A BOOK FROM LIBRARY. HOWEVER, WHEN YOU REACHED HOME, YOU FOUND THAT SOME IMPORTANT PAGES WERE TORN AWAY. WRITE A LETTER TO THE LIBRARIAN EXPLAINING THE SITUATION. YOU SHOULDMENTION THE BOOKMENTION THE PAGESSUGGEST WHAT CAN BE DONE 78
- Many young people regularly change jobs over the years. What are the reasons for this?Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- Some people think that companies and private individuals should pay to clean up the pollution that they produce, not the government. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 82
- You want to sell your television. You think a friend of yours might like to buy it from you.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter explainWhy you are selling the televisionDescribe the televisionSuggest a date when your friend can come and see it 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 131, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... some budget to wipe out contamination. Although some asserts it is the government respo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to bread'
Suggestion: to bread
...reas as most people can not even afford bread and butter for their family. The proble...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34113712375 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87190306339 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7066666341 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8125 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6875 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241603655824 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770439558356 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451193318394 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152333138074 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0135804193461 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.